Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:32:24 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard-Labb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me> Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? Message-ID: <8ADBCF69-67AB-4E39-99D0-9971E942F1FA@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=-BSVYV0z59otkMCQk=1rDaGhN7g@mail.gmail.com> References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> <BANLkTimh582Lbsn0JmXg1MZmpEB%2BTYr6Gw@mail.gmail.com> <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru> <BANLkTi=-BSVYV0z59otkMCQk=1rDaGhN7g@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:07 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
> 2011/4/11 Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org>:
>> Hello, Olivier.
>> You wrote 11 апреля 2011 г., 11:51:09:
>
>> (1) Copied out "upgrade" image has always ${NANO_LABEL}s1 label, and
>> needs manual mdconfig+tunefs before dumping on second code partition
>>
>> (2) updatep2 script uses sed 's/${NANO_DRIVE}s1/${NANO_DRIVE}s2/'
>> script, and if NANO_LABLE is in use (which sets NANO_DRIVE to
>> "ufs/labels1") sed complains.
>>
>
> OK, I didn't see this problem because I'm using my own upgrade script
> (I've merged update1 and update2 in one script):
> http://bsdrp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bsdrp/trunk/Files/usr/local/sbin/upgrade
I also think that FreeNAS has its own script, which I though had been merged to head.
Warner
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8ADBCF69-67AB-4E39-99D0-9971E942F1FA>