Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 18:48:29 +0000 From: Peter Maxwell <peter@allicient.co.uk> To: "freebsd-pf@freebsd.org" <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why merging recent OpenBSD PF code is not easy (was Re: FOLLOW-UP) Message-ID: <CA%2BaY-u6N26QWMCV4vHiprno_wF3rzSgj8LY3jtHoyLKUzmBsgA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <473461417967573@web11h.yandex.ru> References: <363021417833295@web21g.yandex.ru> <20141207111233.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> <473461417967573@web11h.yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 December 2014 at 15:52, Martin Hanson <greencoppermine@yandex.com> wrote: > > > Did anyone on FreeBSD bother to look at that first? > > Multi-threading!? > > So okay, now there's essentially another product on FreeBSD, its NOT PF any > longer! It's "old crap that should have been updated some six years ago" > with > new multi-threading support! And then some fixes here and there by a single > guy, or two guys. > > Bad decisions don't become right just because you sugar coat them with some > new flavor. > > All we need now is a new name, how about fpf (f***ed, PF?). Sorry. > Given you appear to believe you are well acquainted with the problem, why not pull your finger out of your proverbial and sort it yourself?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BaY-u6N26QWMCV4vHiprno_wF3rzSgj8LY3jtHoyLKUzmBsgA>