Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 20:59:11 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Mauro <mcepeda@ualberta.ca> Cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: airport estreme with Freebsd Message-ID: <20050207045911.GA8619@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <1107656286.4131.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1106542417.29481.168.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41F4ADC1.8070201@freebsd.org> <42017276.1010304@finnovative.net> <4201C54A.8090009@freebsd.org> <1107418085.4125.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050206002904.GJ9350@dragon.nuxi.com> <1107656286.4131.20.camel@localhost.localdomain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 07:18:06PM -0700, Mauro wrote: > On Sat, 2005-05-02 at 16:29 -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:08:04AM -0700, Mauro wrote: > > > I don't buy the theory about government frequencies. This theory asks > > > one to believe that government frequencies are not intercepted or > > > tampered with in some fashion. They are tampered with and can be done > > > so easily. Legally sold scanners enable one to listen in to all sorts > > > of private signals. > > > > One, don't top post -- it looses context. This isn't a Mickysoft list. > > > > Two isssue isn't necessarily about receiving certain frequencies as you > > assume. As Peter said one of the issues is the FCC doesn't want you to > > set the TRANSMITTING POWER above a certain power. > > To clarify my statement concerning ethnocentrism, > don't assume we're all american and that the FCC dictates to > non-americans their ideas concerning radio waves. So on a global level, > the excuse that the FCC doesn't approve doesn't wash. It sure does then the company in question is a USA company. They certainly *ARE* under the FCC's regulatory jurisdiction. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050207045911.GA8619>