Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 11:39:32 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Sahil Tandon <sahil@freebsd.org> Cc: Reed Loefgren <rloefgren@forethought.net>, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maybe something useful, maybe not Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1105011134460.3664@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <20110501162748.GB26594@magic.hamla.org> References: <4DBCD165.8090508@forethought.net> <BANLkTinvL8GEEvTaaorSJYygNeuu%2BAhE9Q@mail.gmail.com> <4DBD4200.2060404@gmail.com> <20110501162748.GB26594@magic.hamla.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 1 May 2011, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 07:20:32 -0400, Glen Barber wrote: > >> On 5/1/11 2:34 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >>>> "The geli utility is different than gbde" or as >>> >>> Please, no! >>> >>>> >>>> "The geli utility is different from gbde" >>> >>> Yes, that's correct. >> >> Any particular reason why this one over the previous? I think the >> previous suggestion sounds more correct. > > If I may propose a revision to the entire sentence: > > "The geli utility differs from gbde in that it offers other features > and uses an alternative cryptographic scheme." I'd suggest "The geli utility differs from gbde, offering other features and using a different cryptographic scheme." uses/using may not be necessary.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1105011134460.3664>