Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 17:57:03 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: resource usage overflow Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0302161756130.99373-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20030217121418.V4039-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > 3/ would 64 bits be enough? We are getting both bigger and faster > > 64000 times faster and 64000 times bigger and we are back at seven > > seconds. 640 times faster and 640 times bigger and we are still only at > > 70000 seconds (19 hours) before overflow. > > Er, 64 bit longs provide a factor of 4 billion (not 64000) for bloat. > not that I said 64000 twice... multiply them.. > Bruce > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0302161756130.99373-100000>