Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:34:57 +0100 From: krad <kraduk@gmail.com> To: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> Cc: "Brandon J. Wandersee" <brandon.wandersee@gmail.com>, "Kevin P. Neal" <kpn@neutralgood.org>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Root on ZFS, LiveCD and BE Message-ID: <CALfReydVvRzdq=KPJcr-bo-zLmEDRExr=dPrv-_oQS1=%2BX9Ciw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20160822150455.GA87440@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> References: <20160815145419.GA3619@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <20160815231414.GA84125@neutralgood.org> <20160820105438.GA59960@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <86lgzq1510.fsf@WorkBox.Home> <20160821174246.GA73293@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <86h9aelz9g.fsf@WorkBox.Home> <20160822150455.GA87440@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If you are really that worried about the pool in question and potential damage I would do an image of the drive(s) before doing anything. Than you can restore if anything does go horribly wrong. I'm suprised nobody has mentioned this. On 22 August 2016 at 16:04, Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> wrote: > Brandon J. Wandersee wrote: > > > > > I'll check with the stable version of beadm in bhyve tomorrow, but > > > please note that BE selection made by beadm-devel itself (from a > > > working system) works perfectly. It's only the loader BE selection > > > menu that has this problem. > > I have just verified, the boot menu problem is the same no matter if > beadm of beadm-devel were used for BE creation. > > > > > I just set up boot environments for the first time with sysutils/beadm > > last week myself, so this seemed like as good a time as any to create > > one and try it out. I get the same behavior: activating a boot > > environment from a running system and rebooting works fine, but > > selecting a boot environment from the boot menu fails. So it's probably > > a problem with the loader. I'll comment on the bug report myself > > shortly. > > Thank you for your comment on the bug report. > > What makes me suspicious is the fact that the menu shows > zfs:zroot/ROOT/test1 as the Active BE but the bootfs is still > zfs:zroot/ROOT/default: > > s` `.....---.......--.``` -/ > +============Welcome to FreeBSD===========+ +o .--` /y:` +. > | | yo`:. :o `+- > | 1. Active: zfs:zroot/ROOT/test1 | y/ -/` -o/ > | 2. bootfs: zfs:zroot/ROOT/default | .- ::/sy+:. > | 3. [P]age: 1 of 1 | / `-- / > | | `: :` > | Boot Environments: | `: :` > | 4. test1 | / / > | 5. default | .- -. > | | -- -. > | | `:` `:` > | | .-- `--. > | | .---.....----. > +=========================================+ > > Is it supposed to be so? > > -- > Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN > sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALfReydVvRzdq=KPJcr-bo-zLmEDRExr=dPrv-_oQS1=%2BX9Ciw>