Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 12:49:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "W. Reilly Cooley, Esq." <wcooley@nakedape.ml.org> To: isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Radius login via getty Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980612124811.19782A-100000@rheingold.reed.edu> In-Reply-To: <199806120538.WAA00405@antipodes.cdrom.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, Mike Smith wrote: > This is the "20 million flies" argument. PAM is broken as designed; > implementing it might be expedient, but will never be "right". How is PAM broken? How is the other better? Dein Wil -- ------------------------------------------------------------- W. Reilly Cooley, Esq. Naked Ape Consulting wcooley@nakedape.ml.org http://www.nakedape.ml.org Links page ----> http://www.nakedape.ml.org/links To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.96.980612124811.19782A-100000>