Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:16:42 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>, Jeremy Chadwick <jdc@koitsu.org> Cc: Kenneth Merry <ken@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Stable" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ada(4) and ahci(4) quirk printing Message-ID: <5B93288D-7C5B-403B-863A-658A063A4C2B@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <4D28DBAE46424C268AA22FCDD8657946@multiplay.co.uk> References: <20130422051452.GA2148@icarus.home.lan> <51763BF9.2000506@FreeBSD.org> <20130423092602.GA58831@icarus.home.lan> <51765466.4040209@FreeBSD.org> <4D28DBAE46424C268AA22FCDD8657946@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 23, 2013, at 4:33 AM, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> = wrote: >>>=20 >>> If we can't reach an agreement, I'm happy to wrap the relevant bits = with >>> an "if (bootverbose)", but I really feel users should have some way = to >>> see this information outside of bootverbose. >> Both da and ada drivers already have sysctl's. It should be trivial = to add one more, especially if just numeric. >=20 > Wouldn't camcontrol be a better place for this? Yes, the forest of CAM sysctl's needs to be trimmed and discouraged from = growing. I like Jeremy's original proposal for exposing quirk = information, and I think that it would be served well via camcontrol, = not the console or sysctl. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5B93288D-7C5B-403B-863A-658A063A4C2B>