Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 08 Jan 2001 11:48:05 +0200
From:      Graham Wheeler <gram@cequrux.com>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Just how standard is APM?
Message-ID:  <3A598CD5.CC26D681@cequrux.com>
References:  <3A556040.6B9163BB@cequrux.com>  <3A545615.3597BCF3@cequrux.com> <200101042234.f04MYM147333@harmony.village.org> <200101051755.f05Htpb55318@harmony.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh wrote:
> 
> In message <3A556040.6B9163BB@cequrux.com> Graham Wheeler writes:
> : Nope - as I said, I added log messages to apm.c to log the BIOS probe
> : and they log a failure (I have "device apm0" in my config file).
> 
> What's the failure mode?  Is it enabled in the BIOS (I assume it is,
> otherwise it wouldn't work in 'Doz).

I suspect Mike is right when he says that the machine supports ACPI
only, not APM. That would certainly explain what I observe.

g.

-- 
Dr Graham Wheeler                        E-mail: gram@cequrux.com
Director, Research and Development       WWW:    http://www.cequrux.com
CEQURUX Technologies                     Phone:  +27(21)423-6065
Firewalls/VPN Specialists                Fax:    +27(21)424-3656


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A598CD5.CC26D681>