Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:19:21 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: bikeshed for all! Message-ID: <47606C79.5050009@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20071212180910.H75212@niwun.pair.com> References: <476061FD.8050500@elischer.org> <20071212180910.H75212@niwun.pair.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> So, I'm playing with some multiple routing table support.. >> the first version is a minimal impact version with very limited >> functionality. >> It's done that way so I can put it in RELENG_6/7 without breaking ABIs >> (I hope). >> Later there will be a more flexible version for-current. >> >> Here's the question.. >> >> I need a word to use to describe the network view one is currently on.. >> e.g. if you are usinghe second routing table, you could say I've set >> xxx to 1 >> (0 based).. > > In the spirit of your subject, why not call them 'sheds'? > > -Mike I can see that taking some explaining... confused newbie: "Sheds?? why did they call them sheds?" old hand: "Well Grasshopper, Once there was this Danish guy who ...." [ten minutes later] confused newbie:" HUH? "
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47606C79.5050009>