Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:49:47 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>,Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.org>, grembo@freebsd.org, dteske@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Importing mksh in base Message-ID: <9A54D267-DE69-4C88-857D-9C523C853EDA@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <612ABF23-B940-4692-B977-2DF7CD34BC5C@gid.co.uk> References: <20190125165751.kpcjjncmf7j7maxd@ivaldir.net> <BB2CCC27-9277-4300-BF59-B5C62641A7B1@freebsd.org> <69E462A0-B9E9-4D26-898F-A96036227E65@FreeBSD.org> <201901251727.x0PHRniq094803@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> <862c514f-7c19-ce6c-4438-1e765524cee2@quip.cz> <612ABF23-B940-4692-B977-2DF7CD34BC5C@gid.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 26 janvier 2019 12:43:37 GMT+01:00, Bob Bishop <rb@gid=2Eco=2Euk> a =C3= =A9crit : >Hi, > >> On 25 Jan 2019, at 23:49, Miroslav Lachman <000=2Efbsd@quip=2Ecz> wrote= : >>=20 >> Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote on 2019/01/25 18:27: >>> Heavy tcsh user here - strictly for interactive use (I use bourne >shell for >>> shell scripting) >>> Still, as long as it continues in base (and I'd be first to >volunteer >>> to maintain that if needed - it already contains a few patches of >mine), >>=20 >> Yes please, keep tcsh in base=2E >> After almost 20 years on FreeBSD with tcsh I don't understand how >somebody can user bash as root shell=2E > >+1=20 > >And let=E2=80=99s not forget that bash brought us CVE-2014-6271 (ShellSho= ck)=2E >There may be other vulnerabilities lurking among the fancy gadgets=2E > No one is proposing to bring in bash, mksh is clearly not as fancy as bash Bapt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9A54D267-DE69-4C88-857D-9C523C853EDA>