Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:35:38 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] Re: dlopen() and dlclose() are not MT-safe? YES, esp. for libthr Message-ID: <20060324123538.GH27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20060324121208.GB9523@britannica.bec.de> References: <44215FE9.2070602@highway.ne.jp> <20060322174312.GB27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20060322190725.GC27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4421BA34.8040908@highway.ne.jp> <20060323105440.GD27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20060324084834.GE27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4423DDFA.3090504@highway.ne.jp> <20060324121208.GB9523@britannica.bec.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 01:12:08PM +0100, joerg@britannica.bec.de wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:54:34PM +0900, Kazuaki Oda wrote: > > * The current implementation of rtld has a problem both with > > libpthread and libthr. It works only with libc_r. > > It doesn't work correctly with libc_r. Concurrent dlopen and dlclose of > the same shared object doesn't work fully corretly ATM, but the patch > isn't the best approach either. > > Joerg You promised the patch. Anyway, part of my patch that touched rtld_lock.c shall be discarded. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEI+eVC3+MBN1Mb4gRAn69AKCk+JY+yBCoPUEc7Mc91KTiOS9MigCgx7DB IfLjqatad2Gscw4XZ7cI+9w= =kfj1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060324123538.GH27116>