Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:48:12 -0400 From: Kim Culhan <w8hdkim@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: Interfaces connected by bridge(4) do not pass arp replies Message-ID: <CAKZxVQXpEmu9JwPQKgMjzVPz_LpDtHk%2BausBSqY56guc_UDF3w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAKZxVQXu5tZtnZa7at%2BKxTQAVZqf6kkqaRF=75Em_K_h3nfG0w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAKZxVQVXptkzS-hisKRmaooFaqgrHx7nOouO3Uj4vxuTBqkhTg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BsBSo%2BQy70cLL97KY8BE9L4GR2cwzhLTe6XP_Pe1Qsr8Xa7mQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKZxVQXaZy9H2QR4uz0XzZ%2BmCyX-27CVBQEeFGH=J4G5EtvPXg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BsBSoKmnQAW1WoKnrDzNje5SF1wooW0JVdxb57JjyYpEeFQpA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKZxVQUBC9m0WjQ-n7%2BoJo0=0_DEMU0bnXopsNYqYdgxq2xE0g@mail.gmail.com> <20121030121924.GD70741@FreeBSD.org> <CAKZxVQWOojNbZ58k4tW4O-5%2BiCZFQD_N6%2BB%2BCYnnNDR2rng-Qg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BsBSoKoz-4CntTU_pxwS%2BzynmvKjpM1cKWB%2BthhUNj4%2B-X6iw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKZxVQX6zA0TpVMVT8gNU55AnfAO1wqVVsUeaEeEpwLoHKV5ag@mail.gmail.com> <20121031123746.GR70741@glebius.int.ru> <CAKZxVQXu5tZtnZa7at%2BKxTQAVZqf6kkqaRF=75Em_K_h3nfG0w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:28:48AM -0400, Kim Culhan wrote:
> K> Thanks for that, so far the working revision has been found in r240826.
> K>
> K> Would anyone have a suggestion for a revision to try next ?
>
> Middle between r240826 and revision that didn't work for you. :)
>
> --
> Totus tuus, Glebius.
Searching for the revision which did not work, I started with a test
machine at a revision which was working and
tested several builds until the latest at the time: r242429, where it
is still working.
The 'non-working' machine was also updated to r242429 and it is still
not working.
For this update, the existing /usr/src tree was removed and a new tree
checked-out, /usr/obj was removed before
building.
The working machine had 2 identical em interfaces, so removed one and
installed it into the non-working machine
replacing an re interface there.
The em interface on the working machine looks like:
em0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric
0 mtu 1500
options=4009b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWTSO>
ether 00:15:17:93:95:c9
inet6 fe80::215:17ff:fe93:95c9%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
status: active
The identical type em interface on the non-working machine looks like:
em0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric
0 mtu 1500
options=40098<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWTSO>
ether 00:15:17:98:5f:e6
inet6 fe80::215:17ff:fe98:5fe6%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
status: active
Note the options on the cards are now different, how can I [re]enable
RXCSUM,TXCSUM on the card
which was moved?
Any thoughts on what could be going on would be greatly appreciated.
thanks
-kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKZxVQXpEmu9JwPQKgMjzVPz_LpDtHk%2BausBSqY56guc_UDF3w>