Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:43:24 +0200 From: David Rio <drio@perpels.com> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Branches new doc? Message-ID: <20030722134324.GA77054@perpels.com> In-Reply-To: <20030722103319.GA75950@perpels.com> References: <20030722103319.GA75950@perpels.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for all the answers. Now I have get it. All you were right, as always, all the information was out there. Thanks again. On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:33:19PM +0200, David Rio wrote: > Hi all: > > I thought I have already understood the FreeBSD source control system > but during this days I have discover that I was wrong. > > Normally I use FreeBSD on production machines so I install 4.7 or 4.8. > Finally I decided to install FreeBSD on my new laptop and I thougth > that 5.1 would be the best option. > After install it, I wanted to update the sources against the central > repository. I thought, what will be the best branch to follow for me? > -STABLE. But after some readings I discovered that there is no such > Branch for 5.1. So if I install 5.1 I just can follow -CURRENT or > the patch branch. > After travel against the central repository using cvsweb, I realize > that there are branchs that I didn't know about. > > So, in conclusion, don't you think there is a lack of documentation > about this topic? If not, please point me to the rigth documentation > because it is crucial for me to understand all about this topic. > > Thanks and apologize if this is not the right place to put this. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030722134324.GA77054>