Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Apr 2012 06:29:54 +0000
From:      "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org>
To:        George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com>
Cc:        net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Question about fixing udp6_input...
Message-ID:  <8C579D33-72F0-4E82-AD93-CA7BBA3531A8@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <280454D9-E233-4010-8810-588296FA19D1@neville-neil.com>
References:  <280454D9-E233-4010-8810-588296FA19D1@neville-neil.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 20. Apr 2012, at 01:44 , George Neville-Neil wrote:

> Howdy,
>=20
> At the moment the prototype for udp6_input() is the following:
>=20
> int
> udp6_input(struct mbuf **mp, int *offp, int proto)
>=20
> and udp_input() looks like this:
>=20
> void
> udp_input(struct mbuf *m, int off)
>=20
> As far as I can tell we immediately change **mp to *m and *offp to off
> in udp6_input() and we also never use proto in the rest of the =
function.
>=20
> Is there any reason to not make udp6_input() look exactly like =
udp_input() ?

I think the answer to this is here:

http://wiki.freebsd.org/IPv6TODO#Remove_ip6protosw

--=20
Bjoern A. Zeeb                                 You have to have visions!
   It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8C579D33-72F0-4E82-AD93-CA7BBA3531A8>