Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 14:37:41 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> To: "Eugene M. Zheganin" <eugene@zhegan.in> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of ZFS in FreeBSD Message-ID: <20181220143741.GA40569@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4481f3cb-4535-bed3-c09f-429553f8f88b@zhegan.in> References: <CAPrugNriggEMMnLTZtf6xNQNYajBYNMnGdN96-ejDYQonoOhgw@mail.gmail.com> <20181219163033.jwm7opiwmdhbk6p3@mutt-hbsd> <a64a41fd-f287-cf9d-cd4c-9e55c21c2f00@freebsd.org> <4481f3cb-4535-bed3-c09f-429553f8f88b@zhegan.in>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 03:49:38PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > On 19.12.2018 23:32, Allan Jude wrote: > > The biggest thing to remember is that this is still OpenZFS, and still > > run by the same developers as it has been. We are just commonizing on > > the repo that has the most features integrated into it. > > Does it mean that ZoF and thus FreeBSD will lose NFSv4 ACLs because > there is no such thing in ZoL? +1. I'm also worried if this would bring more Linuxish bits into our kernel (cf. LinuxKPI). Also, I thought that ZFS was never really native to Linux but implemented through SPL (Solaris Porting Layer), and Linux' VFS is not ARC-aware unlike Solaris and FreeBSD. It would be quite upsetting to see ZFS as we know it in FreeBSD become pessimized because of those things. :-( ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20181220143741.GA40569>