Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 01:30:58 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Move u2f-devd into base? Message-ID: <20240109013058.22807f3816603829316cef4c@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfqpbL=QNgTwBveUpBooucX2MbfZnR9dw4w25_TXYOyuDg@mail.gmail.com> References: <ZZwLx1RxlY6xuvFV@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <CANCZdfqpbL=QNgTwBveUpBooucX2MbfZnR9dw4w25_TXYOyuDg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 08:18:38 -0700
Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 7:55〓AM Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
> wrote:
>
> > We have FIDO/U2F support for SSH in base.
> >
> > We also have a group "u2f", 116, in the default /etc/group file.
> >
> > Why do we keep the devd configuration (to chgrp the device nodes)
> > in a port, security/u2f-devd? Can't we just add this to base, too?
> > It's just another devd configuration file.
> >
>
> This properly belongs to devfs.conf no? Otherwise it's a race...
>
> Warner
>
> --
> > Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
It's devd.conf materials. It actually is security/usf-devd/files
u2f.conf and its contents is sets of notify 100 { match "vendor" ...
match "product" ... action "chgrpy u2f ..." };.
Some hase more items in it, though.
So it should be in ports to adapt for latest products more quickly than
in base, I think.
--
Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20240109013058.22807f3816603829316cef4c>