Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:25:12 +0200 From: markm@FreeBSD.ORG To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KAME, IPSec, OpenBSD and FreeBSD Message-ID: <200103240824.f2O8O2f62111@gratis.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: <20010324.002308.36954645.ume@FreeBSD.org> ; from Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.ORG> "Sat, 24 Mar 2001 00:23:08 %2B0900." References: <20010324.002308.36954645.ume@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I just sent to you directry, then the mail was rejected. I dunno why. > So, I reply to this mail. Many apologies - I'm tuning spam filters. > mark> I am very interested in improving FreeBSD's in-kernel crypto, and > mark> I'd like to use the OpenBSD code. Amongs other things, this will > mark> give us access to excellent hardware encryption. > > Since, KAME is ported to all BSDs which includes OpenBSD, I think it > should be once merged to KAME, then porting to FreeBSD is better. That makes sense to me. > Since IPsec part of FreeBSD came from KAME and IPsec is still working > progress in KAME, I suggest that you should ask KAME guys (especially > itojun) about the possibility of merging. I'll do that. > BTW, I'll start merging recent KAME into 5-CURRENT after 4.3-RELEASE > is out. Great! :-) :-) I'm going ahead with the sys/crypto in the meanwhile (unless this is a bad idea - please let me know) M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103240824.f2O8O2f62111>