Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:02:22 -0600 From: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r367928 - in head/sys: compat/freebsd32 kern sys Message-ID: <CACNAnaGKdSLgMUJwb0HwGgHXJgJ-qe5ng9gV62MmxyssS7rCSQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <X7oZcKwB7FZ1j7fo@kib.kiev.ua> References: <202011220534.0AM5Yp4u071733@repo.freebsd.org> <X7oZcKwB7FZ1j7fo@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 1:55 AM Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 05:34:51AM +0000, Kyle Evans wrote: > > Author: kevans > > Date: Sun Nov 22 05:34:51 2020 > > New Revision: 367928 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/367928 > > > > Log: > > _umtx_op: move compat32 definitions back in > > > > These are reasonably compact, and a future commit will blur the compat32 > > lines by supporting 32-bit operations with the native _umtx_op. > > I do not mind much about placement of the compat32 syscall stubs, but I > did suggested and liked move of the compat32 structures definitions into > freebsd32.h. > > They are actually useful that way, at least allowing me to write some (private) > tests in the past. Ah, sure, sorry- this doesn't force us to re-add implementation details to other headers, so I don't see any problem. I will move just the struct definitions back shortly.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACNAnaGKdSLgMUJwb0HwGgHXJgJ-qe5ng9gV62MmxyssS7rCSQ>