Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 15:54:42 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: dmaddox@scsn.net, mike@smith.net.au Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Shouldn't 'make includes' install stand.h? Message-ID: <199810050554.PAA28570@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I'm not trying to be combative here; this is not a religious issue to >> me... The current behavior just seems to me to violate POLA. > >Only if you have misapprehensions about what 'make includes' does. It >seems mostly to trip up people with such misapprehensions. `includes' is a private target in src/Makefile for installing [all] the includes. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810050554.PAA28570>