Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:37:40 +0200 From: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> To: Mark Martinec <Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: recommended poudriere jail versions? Message-ID: <560E6C84.3010500@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <e2532564e560b15b4b725e29d441da1e@mailbox.ijs.si> References: <20151001103206.2d2603a4@efreet.kappastar.com> <e2532564e560b15b4b725e29d441da1e@mailbox.ijs.si>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/01/15 14:05, Mark Martinec wrote: > 2015-10-01 10:32, Marko Cupać wrote: >> what is the recommended poudriere jail version for building ports? So >> far I was trying to be on latest binary patchlevel for every minor >> version for both base system, poudriere jails and clients, but I ended >> up with three jails just for amd64 (9.3, 10.1 and 10.2), where I need to >> rebuild all the ports every time I patch poudriere jails. This is >> starting to take too much of my time. >> >> I see that pkg.freebsd.org hosts just one set of ports per >> architecture of major version. What is the OS version they are built >> on? Are there any downsides in building all the ports for >> 10.2-<latestpathclevel> on 10.1-<nopatches>? > > I used to have poudriere jails based on a minor version like you have, > but ended up in a simplified setup, building ports only on 10.0-RELEASE > and installing them on 10.1 or 10.2 and 10-STABLE. I think the > official packages are also built based on 10.0-RELEASE . Official packages are being build on 10.1-RELEASE at present. It's the lowest supported minor in the 10 branch. -- Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?560E6C84.3010500>