Date: Wed, 07 Aug 1996 14:05:25 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM>, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whither gcc 2.7? Message-ID: <6734.839419525@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Aug 1996 04:36:01 PDT." <10357.839417761@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <10357.839417761@time.cdrom.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >> The more I think about it, the more I'm changing my mind and coming to the >> opinion that we can do a lot more with it if the parts that we need go >> into src/contrib with the bmake build points in the correct part of the >> tree as usual. > >And I believe that's even the politically correct method these days, >too! :-) One gripe somebody had with Poul's TCL import was that he >didn't also check in the script, be it ever so simple, that "created" >the importable sources. NetBSD does this, a good example being in >freefall:/c/NetBSD/NetBSD-current/src/gnu/usr.bin/gcc/gcc2netbsd, and >I figure we should too. Hey a "gripe" ? I saw it as a very good suggestion :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6734.839419525>