Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:21:10 -0500
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>
To:        Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc:        erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com, grog@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)
Message-ID:  <20121102162110.GB92218@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
In-Reply-To: <201211021021.qA2ALJLF020996@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
References:  <20121102060818.GB48921@eureka.lemis.com> <201211021021.qA2ALJLF020996@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:21:19AM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> 	Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:08:18 +1100
> 	From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@freebsd.org>
> 	To: Erich Dollansky <erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com>
> 	Subject: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)
>=20
> 	On Friday,  2 November 2012 at 12:21:03 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> 	> Hi,
> 	>
> 	> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:59:17 -0700
> 	> Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> 	>>
> 	>> BTW, the name of the language is "Fortran".  It's been "Fortran"
> 	>> for the last 30-something years.
> 	>
> 	> I never realised the name change. It seems that I am not alone with
> 	> this.
>=20
> 	Nor I.  Looking at the Wikipedia page, I discover that it had been
> 	spelt "Fortran" as early as 1956, and there's even a copy of the 1956
> 	Fortran manual online: http://www.fortran.com/FortranForTheIBM704.pdf
> 	Interesting reading.
>=20
> come on guys, fortran is not case sensitive...
>=20
> Anyway I guess it's good news that LLVM
> is being used also by Cray and Nvidia.
> It's a shame though that, with LLVM as the
> default compiler, further development of
> FreeBSD/ia64 and FreeBSD/sparc64
> will probably suffer and then stop altogether.

If you read either my annoucment or the diff closly you will note that
the default it only changing for x86 architectures.

-- Brooks

--GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFQk/L1XY6L6fI4GtQRAu1WAKDANoPoAyj2krsIvmuiEAgHtcQM1ACgqaxJ
imXPKisgX8V8iusqnNX3WAI=
=ByH2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121102162110.GB92218>