Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:21:58 -0500 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Dave Zarzycki <zarzycki@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Message-ID: <20010822212158.X81307@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108221713240.16888-200000@bonk.apple.com>; from zarzycki@freebsd.org on Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 05:15:18PM -0700 References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108221713240.16888-200000@bonk.apple.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Dave Zarzycki <zarzycki@freebsd.org> [010822 19:23] wrote: > Attached and tested. > > I'd like to merge this in unless anybody objects. I don't object, I'm just wondering if you know could discuss the implementation here versus the other ones avaiable at: http://www.psc.edu/networking/all_sack.html About the strength/weaknesses of those methods versus this one. The one developed at PSC looks like the most advanced one. Is this work derived from any of those? -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010822212158.X81307>