Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:13:19 -0700 From: Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com> To: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: est man page Message-ID: <1338930799.10539.12.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1338922510.10539.8.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> References: <1338922510.10539.8.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 11:55 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > I note that x86/cpufreq/est.c has some tuneables and I have processors > that seem to be not supported by est even though they appear to have > Speedstep features: > > p4tcc0: <CPU Frequency Thermal Control> on cpu0 > est1: <Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control> on cpu1 > est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. > est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 15 > device_attach: est1 attach returned 6 > *ACTUALLY* this was caused by the Dell r410 that I was using having its Power Managment control set to "Advanced Power Management" and not "OS Control". After I set that, the acpi methods in est attached correctly. Sean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1338930799.10539.12.camel>