Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 22:41:45 -0500 (EST) From: matt <matt@BabCom.ORG> To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: file name with questions - rm on it seg faults!!! Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.20.9911072229050.41009-100000@s01.arpa-canada.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911072152350.46866-100000@green.myip.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 7 Nov 1999, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
[.snip.]
: That's correct, since they both use fts(3). I recall that it's still
: not fixed; even in OpenBSD's source, it's better than ours getting
: crashed, but it's still not fixed properly.
By 'not fixed' do you mean that the problem is not "properly" fixed, or
that the vulnerabilty is still there?
[.snip.]
: --
: Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! /
: green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------'
--
"If the primates that we came from had known that someday politicians
would come out of the...the gene pool, they'd a stayed up in the trees
and written evolution off as a bad idea. Hell, I always thought the
opposable thumb was overrated."
-Sheridan, "A Distant Star"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.20.9911072229050.41009-100000>