Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:08:11 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: "Kirill Ponomarew" <krion@voodoo.bawue.com> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/ppracer Makefile pkg-descr Message-ID: <cb5206420706150908x5e93efe7xed494fbe35f3cd31@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070615154408.GH19707@voodoo.bawue.com> References: <200706151319.l5FDJ3ZT002340@repoman.freebsd.org> <cb5206420706150625h1554d0blabda24b04f50a626@mail.gmail.com> <20070615135952.GE19707@voodoo.bawue.com> <cb5206420706150755w561da70ei8ae7dc21809cdc37@mail.gmail.com> <20070615154408.GH19707@voodoo.bawue.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 6/15/07, Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.bawue.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:55:20PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > On 6/15/07, Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.bawue.com> wrote: > > > Andrew, please stop sending such kind of comments to > > > ports-committers@ alias, in this case it really should be sent > > > privately. But, frankly speaking, even if I get it privately, I'd > > > smile. You should really *think* before you mail your comments to > > > ports-committers list, these above comments are inappropriate here. > > > > > > Please move all you technical items for commits whether to ports@ > > > and discuss it there, or privately, depending how *important* is > > > your comment. Inserting the coins for every commit and do it in > > > ports-committers@ is not what I expected while discussing technical > > > review explanations. > > > > I'm the one who sends most messages, but this is not > > a one-man effort. Many people read them, some comment > > on them - and we all learn. And this is the point: > > making committers aware of the amount of problems in > > our commits, discussing them together. I'm not an > > automated process, we must all learn from each other's > > mistakes, broadcasted to a list, because we just don't > > have enough human resources for private lessons. > > Sorry, but it's high level crap to discuss here stuff like Approved > by: "pointyhat via kris", "pointyhat", "portsmon via linimon" or > just "portsmon". I don't want to see here the "yet another policy > and discussion how to write Approved by: line", should I write pav@ > or just pav, "via" kris or just kris. Andrew, I'm just repeating, > these are crap comments and they shouldn't belong to > ports-committers list. I get your message, I'll try to raise a bar a bit for qualifying comments on this front. > > As for the mailing-list, I think ports-committers is > > the most appropriate one because this is primarily an > > inter-committer process. > > You can't even really imagine how many users read ports-committers > list just to know the changes in the ports tree. They're not > interested in the above notes. So, please respect our users as well > and don't think only about committers guys. Try to use threaded mode or something. You're right, a lot of people are subscribed. I expected some of them to be extremely annoyed by my "spam". I'm sorry for that. Right now I'm just happy that you're the only one who have voiced it.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420706150908x5e93efe7xed494fbe35f3cd31>