Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:36:35 +0400 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UDP/TCP versus IP frames - subtle out of order packets with hardware hashing Message-ID: <20140715143635.GA5178@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomTL=fZnjSTBT6-3KNA0DOqNEefoXNwFipade81dSBK5Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-VmomUNJ23CHLLX2qryAuE2XQyBmo30du3MuRnobs%2BwEkguA@mail.gmail.com> <53C4EE00.5090705@gmail.com> <20140715093125.GA89128@zxy.spb.ru> <53C507F2.2090604@gmail.com> <20140715113319.GA96254@zxy.spb.ru> <CAJ-VmomTL=fZnjSTBT6-3KNA0DOqNEefoXNwFipade81dSBK5Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:33:57AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 15 July 2014 04:33, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 03:22:34PM +0430, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: > > > >> On 7/15/2014 2:01 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 01:31:52PM +0430, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: > >> > > >> >> Doesn't the problem applies to TCP too? > >> >> TCP may be fragmented too but is less likely because of MSS. > >> > Don't forget GRE, IPIP, ESP and AH! > >> > > >> These protocols don't use port numbers and the RSS hash is computed based on the > >> (srcip,dstip) tuple, so the problem does not apply to them. > > > > And all flows go to one queue? Bad. > > All the packets between two IP addresses for non-TCP, non-UDP get > hashed to the same CPU core, yes. > > If you have 1000 IP tunnels to different end-hosts, they'll be on > different CPUs. What about two host, 10G link and 1000 TCP connections over IPsec?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140715143635.GA5178>