Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1998 08:56:27 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc services Message-ID: <27094.888166587@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 22 Feb 1998 12:33:48 %2B0100." <19980222123348.16912@keltia.freenix.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Wait, I thought IANA policy was to allocate both protocols at the same time > to avoid having one service on udp and another on tcp on the same > port... Why can't we keep on this way ? Gah! One set of people tell me "it doesn't use UDP, take it out!" and another group says "keep it in!" and I say "Why the $@#%&^! is it that the really small insignificant changes generate the most bloody traffic?" Case in point: I'm still waiting for *anyone* save Mike Smith (who just confirmed it for me last night) to respond to my "VFAT/FAT32 support is in -current now, can someone test it?" and yet I've gotten about 6 messages about 4 stupid lines in /etc/services. Am I the only one here who thinks that people have their priorities rather severely skewed? :-) Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?27094.888166587>