Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:47:58 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Avleen Vig <lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will 5.4 be an "Extended Life" release? Message-ID: <20050426094758.GI12673@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20050426020924.GX29262@silverwraith.com> References: <20050412213328.GC1953@lava.net> <6.2.1.2.2.20050417185631.05349ee0@localhost> <200504180330.37184.danny@ricin.com> <20050426020924.GX29262@silverwraith.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2005-Apr-25 19:09:24 -0700, Avleen Vig wrote: >On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 03:30:37AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote: >> Let me just boldly insert that IMHO, if 6.X is going to become stable this >> autumn already that indeed 5.4 or maybe 5.5 at least one of those must be >> long-term-supported. I'm sure one of the two will, as one of the two will >> reflcet ultimately the walk-of-life of 5-STABLE, won't it? > >Why don't we just skip 6 and name it "FreeBSD X" or "FreeBSD 10" ? Why not just merge XFree86 (or X.org) into 4.11 and release it as "FreeDeskTop 12"? -- Peter Jeremy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050426094758.GI12673>