Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:25:45 -0500 (CDT) From: "Sean C. Farley" <scf@FreeBSD.org> To: John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net> Cc: Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.freebsd.org>, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: are the vmware3* ports still needed? Message-ID: <20070723092248.J9030@thor.farley.org> In-Reply-To: <200707221126.57742.lists@jnielsen.net> References: <20070722061625.GD4336@soaustin.net> <46A336F6.6040103@jp.FreeBSD.org> <200707221126.57742.lists@jnielsen.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, John Nielsen wrote: *snip* > Anyway, I think that the emulators/vmware3 port should remain at least > until a usable replacement appears. If there _is_ a compelling > argument to axe it, a heads-up should probably go to a wider audience > than -emulation, possibly including one or more of -ports, -questions > and -stable. I saw this changeset[1] for VirtualBox recently. It offers a little hope for another alternative. Obviously, it is not complete, yet the UI supposedly builds already on FreeBSD. Sean 1. http://www.virtualbox.org/changeset/3680 -- scf@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070723092248.J9030>