Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:14:21 +0200
From:      Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
To:        freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SWAP size
Message-ID:  <200304282314.22236.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <200304281054.48976.ryba@kompakt.pl>
References:  <200304281054.48976.ryba@kompakt.pl>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Monday 28 April 2003 10:54, Piotr Rybicki wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> In man tuning(7) we read, that swap size should be about 2x main memmory
> size. Why swap size should be so big? Isn't swap size equal to main memmory
> size enough?

IMHO the swapsize=2x phys. mem size has always been just a rule of thumb. You 
need as much swap as you need (doh). But so far, the memory requirements of 
software have pretty much grown proportionally with the availibility / 
affordability of bigger sticks of memory and thus the rule of thumb still 
makes sense. YMMV.

-- 
Regards,
	Michael Nottebrock

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQA+rZmuXhc68WspdLARAhjFAKCmnenqs1EQgJRujtsw0buvBcuy+gCeIX3c
AderGVxnKPgED8qCyVRkKRU=
=xscJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304282314.22236.michaelnottebrock>