Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:03:18 +0400
From:      "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Li-Wen Hsu" <lwhsu@freebsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@freebsd.org, YUAN Jue <yuanjue@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/kdesvn Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
Message-ID:  <cb5206420706151003ha34175ep52551e538e2e7f8d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070615164901.GA86604@FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw>
References:  <200706151428.l5FESrEq080128@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070615142857.64CA516A498@hub.freebsd.org> <cb5206420706150837k7cf47262q3beb677705a49f9f@mail.gmail.com> <20070615164901.GA86604@FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On 6/15/07, Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 19:37:15 +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > > +.if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
> > > +DOCSDIR=       ${PREFIX}/share/doc/HTML/en/kdesvn
> > >  .endif
> >
> >  Is there any merit to this DOCSDIR definition being
> >  conditional?
>
> Seems no.  Sometimes I put this in the Makefile:
>
> .if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
> DOCSDIR=        /some/other/place
> PORTDOCS=       *
> .endif

In spite of what bsd.port.mk says, PORTDOCS can be safely
defined even if NOPORTDOCS is defined. Acting on PORTDOCS
is conditionalized by this line:
.if defined(PORTDOCS) && !defined(NOPORTDOCS)

> Besides, though I don't really care where the review goes. (I am very happy
> with this)  But since some people don't like this.  How about replying the
> commit in private, and maintaining a "Common Mistakes when Porting" list,
> after a number of items collected?  Posting it to ports@ list and put into
> the porter's handbook might be a good idea.  This can get more porters'
> attention, and easier to find.  Sometimes, looking for something in the
> high-traffic mailing list is quite hard.  After all, not everyone read
> every commit message and its reply, but every should read the handbook
> (and read again when it is updated), right?

The thing I hope for is that the guys that are so kindly
watching me right now will later help us do the very thing
you describe - figuring out the most common mistakes and
documenting some best practices to avoid them. I'm afraid
I won't be able to do it all alone.

Moreover, as we've already seen, the pleasant part of the
public resonance contributes invaluable opinions to many
issues.

Thanks!


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420706151003ha34175ep52551e538e2e7f8d>