Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:58:10 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: michaelnottebrock@gmx.net Cc: alex@hightemplar.com Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history Message-ID: <20040626.175810.127902013.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <200406261535.47434.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <200406261336.26051.alex@hightemplar.com> <20040626125907.5b5b3ae7.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <200406261535.47434.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200406261535.47434.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> writes:
: On Saturday 26 June 2004 12:59, Miguel Mendez wrote:
: > On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:36:25 +0300
: > Alex Keahan <alex@hightemplar.com> wrote:
: >
: > Hi,
: >
: > > Is Solaris/x86 supported by ibcs2 or svr4? Solaris/x86 is being
: > > actively developed by Sun and is far from extinct.
: >
: > Solaris/x86 is a niche product.
: > [...]
:
: That's all very subjective arguments. The question is, does the binary compat
: _work_ for any recent Solaris/x86 stuff? I rather doubt it, but haven't
: checked, Scott seems to suggest it doesn't.
I tried with 2.7 libc and binaries from solaris. No joy. Maybe I did
something wrong, but I was unsuccessful. This was in the pre
5.0-RELEASE days.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040626.175810.127902013.imp>