Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:14:12 -0700 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r304244 - head/sys/kern Message-ID: <20160826231412.GP1069@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <529d7219-4dc9-eb06-2a5d-682c725855f6@FreeBSD.org> References: <201608162155.u7GLtYp4091232@repo.freebsd.org> <529d7219-4dc9-eb06-2a5d-682c725855f6@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:18:14AM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote: B> On 8/16/2016 2:55 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: B> > Author: glebius B> > Date: Tue Aug 16 21:55:34 2016 B> > New Revision: 304244 B> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/304244 B> > B> > Log: B> > We should not be allowing a timeout to reset when a drain is in progress on B> > it (either async or sync drain). B> > B> > At this moment the only user of drain is TCP, but TCP wouldn't reschedule a B> > callout after it has drained it, since it drains only when a tcpcb is closed. B> > This for now the problem isn't observed. B> > B> > Submitted by: rrs B> B> Should this be MFC'd into 11.0? I'm bit on fence on this. As said this is commit for a problem not observed. I prefer not to touch stable branches for no good reason. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160826231412.GP1069>