Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 11:11:55 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Cc: spork@super-g.com, black@zen.cypher.net, mrcpu@cdsnet.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenBSD Message-ID: <199706231811.LAA01010@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <E0wgA4W-0005aQ-00@rover.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at Jun 23, 97 08:26:24 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : > > Of course, the "20 or more security fixes", w/o mentioning subsystems was > I have at least 50 in my tree here from OpenBSD and about 150 more on > deck to check out when I get the time and energy again. The "checkout" > ones are running about 50% in FreeBSD, 40% should be in FreeBSD, 9% > OpenBSD specific for some reason, and 1% bad fixes. Have you clarified for them the "bad fixes"? I would hate for FreeBSD to do the same thing that Lynne Jolitz did regarding the patchkit patches: state that there were bad fixes, and then refuse to identify them so that they could be defended (or repaired). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706231811.LAA01010>