Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:21:30 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pfg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r326408 - in head: lib/libfetch sbin/recoverdisk share/examples/BSD_daemon share/examples/libusb20 sys/dev/led sys/dev/md sys/dev/mn sys/dev/ppbus sys/i386/i386 sys/kern sys/sys sys/x86... Message-ID: <20171130212130.GI2272@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <201711302033.vAUKXju7022512@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201711302033.vAUKXju7022512@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 08:33:45PM +0000, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > head/usr.sbin/ctm/ctm/ctm.c > head/usr.sbin/ctm/ctm/ctm_ed.c > head/usr.sbin/ctm/ctm/ctm_input.c > head/usr.sbin/ctm/ctm/ctm_pass1.c > head/usr.sbin/ctm/ctm/ctm_pass2.c > head/usr.sbin/ctm/ctm/ctm_pass3.c > head/usr.sbin/ctm/ctm/ctm_passb.c > head/usr.sbin/ctm/ctm/ctm_syntax.c Does ctm in base serve any purpose ? README file in the usr.sbin/ctm seems to claim that ctm is generic-purpose tree diff and apply tool. But also, near the end, the same text claims that cvsup has replaced the ctm, hmm. Does anybody use ctm for any purpose, not necessary keeping up FreeBSD source tree ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171130212130.GI2272>