Date: 11 Jun 2002 14:44:25 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Peter Edwards <peter.edwards@openet-telecom.com> Cc: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Looking for comments on a new utility... Message-ID: <xzpn0u2c7di.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <3D05EFA8.6070805@openet-telecom.com> References: <20020611051517.A87966@FreeBSD.ORG> <3D05EFA8.6070805@openet-telecom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Edwards <peter.edwards@openet-telecom.com> writes: > Isn't the kvm_*() interface somewhat frowned upon? Is there anything > missing from /proc that you need kvm_* for? /proc is also frowned upon, use sysctl. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpn0u2c7di.fsf>