Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 08 Jun 2001 10:56:35 -0400
From:      "Antoine Beaupre (LMC)" <Antoine.Beaupre@ericsson.ca>
To:        Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc:        Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Bug: rmail in /bin (was: root & toor)
Message-ID:  <3B20E7A3.DBC587BB@lmc.ericsson.se>
References:  <20010607212013.B4738@anarchy.com> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0106080830090.17003-100000@srv2.any> <20010608090357.B12983@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <200106081446.KAA36576@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garrett Wollman wrote:
> 
> <<On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:03:57 +0300, Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> said:
> 
> > But yes, this is apparently a documented bug - rmail is not part of the boot
> > process, there is no real need for it in 'emergency' situations when /usr
> > is not mounted yet, so no, it should not really reside in /bin.
> 
> Unfortunately, as with /etc/rmt, it is part of a protocol the
> client implementations of which we do not control.

IIRC, /etc/rmt is a symlink.

Why not the same for rmail?

$2%

A.

--
La sémantique est la gravité de l'abstraction.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B20E7A3.DBC587BB>