Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 22:13:01 -0400 From: Donn Miller <dmmiller@cvzoom.net> To: Matthew Emmerton <matt@gsicomp.on.ca> Cc: Conrad Sabatier <conrads@home.com>, Bob K <melange@yip.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: supfile idea (was Re: Releases) Message-ID: <3AD26C2D.CD7049F0@cvzoom.net> References: <XFMail.20010409195015.conrads@home.com> <008901c0c162$8a684960$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Emmerton wrote: > I like the idea of stable-supfile, so it should stay. standard-supfile > should *definitely* refer to the -REL in which it is a part of. In that > case, a novice user who doesn't change anything would end up cvsup'ing code > that they already have on their system or on CD - no harm done. Personally, I think "standard-supfile" should be renamed "current-supfile", because it cvsups -current. Also, put some kind of warning in there that states you are about to cvsup an unstable, untested development version of FreeBSD. I think unstable-supfile is another good possibility. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AD26C2D.CD7049F0>