Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 03:30:56 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: __fpclassifyd problem Message-ID: <20031020.033056.24857330.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20031019221341.GA32851@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20031019204629.GC49466@rot13.obsecurity.org> <3F92FC99.8010802@freebsd.org> <20031019221341.GA32851@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message: <20031019221341.GA32851@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> writes:
: I sent in an email *along time ago* about this type
: of problem. See the fallout due to revision 1.24
: of lib/libc/stdio/findfp.c. IMHO, all shared libraries
: versions should have been bumped in going from 4.x to
: 5.0.
I tend to agree due to some weirdness that forced the libc bump.
However, this would then have to includ all ports libraries too.
Bumping all ports libraries and having a viable ports system that
built on both 4.x and 5.x would then become nightmarish because you'd
not want to bump them on 4.x.
Warner
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031020.033056.24857330.imp>