Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 07:56:55 +0100 From: Timo Geusch <freebsd@timog.prestel.co.uk> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ep0 etherlink III breakage Message-ID: <19990922075655.A11837@tabby.timog.prestel.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <19990922024022.421791CA7@overcee.netplex.com.au>; from Peter Wemm on Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 10:40:22AM %2B0800 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990921141454.3365A-100000@earth.anet-stl.com> <19990922024022.421791CA7@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 10:40:22AM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > No, it's better to remove "device ep0 at isa ? port foo irq blah ..." etc > and just have "device ep0" *only*. If the pnp code finds it, let it use > pnp to configure it. Does it do that by now? About two or three months ago it didn't and I started writing the necessary code. Now I'm just learning how to remotely debug the kernel... Cheers, Timo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990922075655.A11837>