Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 01:11:03 +0200 From: vermaden <vermaden@interia.pl> To: Sulev-Madis Silber <freebsd-stable-freebsd-org730@ketas.si.pri.ee>, "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>, freebsd-pkgbase@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why pkg(8) is NOT bootstrapped in PKGBASE install by default? Message-ID: <ucwlajrmyvpxglczgnfg@ugau> In-Reply-To: <CAC88F06-7703-4B6F-AF58-287F3BB2E605@ketas.si.pri.ee> References: <ogyaljbznqjydgfagdst@pama> <0100019954a0298d-e00ba983-7e29-427a-a67c-b2bdf11d122e-000000@email.amazonses.com> <ceoawzgqmuzaqrcgcppp@ipzi> <CAC88F06-7703-4B6F-AF58-287F3BB2E605@ketas.si.pri.ee>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
I used this image: - FreeBSD-15.0-ALPHA2-amd64-20250914-da62a299de31-280122-disc1.iso Its official 15.0-ALPHA2 'disc1.iso' image. Regards, vermaden Temat: Re: Why pkg(8) is NOT bootstrapped in PKGBASE install by default? Data: 2025-09-17 0:49 Nadawca: "Sulev-Madis Silber" <freebsd-stable-freebsd-org730@ketas.si.pri.ee> Adresat: stable@freebsd.org; > memstick too i hope? > > or any installer which contains pkgbase? > > or perhaps any installer? > > i don't get why this decision was made. you can always upgrade pkg. > but what if it's truly offline? > > i never understood why pkg is not in base. after all that's like most > important tool ever. especially now > > yeah, everyone can take src and build whatever installer they want > but hell with those defaults > > only reason here is that pkg should always be latest and can't in > some cases be upgraded? > > at least give me reasons i can disagree with!help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ucwlajrmyvpxglczgnfg>