Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 10:55:39 -0800 (PST) From: Tom <tom@sdf.com> Cc: dmaddox@scsn.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 16650 Support(?) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980112105414.9226A-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <19980112183453.53078@deepo.prosa.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Philippe Regnauld wrote: > Donald J. Maddox writes: > > > > The AT command to use both B channels is 'AT@B0=2' on the BitSURFR; however, > > it has 3 different rate adaption protocols: V.120, AIMux, and PPP. If I > > use V.120, everything works great, but, unfortunately, V.120 does not support > > channel bonding. > > Err.. I do 2x64 bundling everyday from home to the office on ZyXEL TAs using > V.120 (between pppd and iijppp). Except that V120 results in really bad performance. Some TAs can't make bonded V120 calls. No big deal, because V120 is terrible for PPP anyhow. > -- > -[ Philippe Regnauld / sysadmin / regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk / +55.4N +11.3E ]- > "Pluto placed his bad dog at the entrance of Hades to keep the dead IN and > the living OUT! The archetypical corporate firewall?" > - S. Kelly Bootle, about Cerberus ["MYTHOLOGY", in Marutukku distrib] - > > Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.980112105414.9226A-100000>