Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:13:09 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: firefox: Xft + FreeType2, is it possible? Message-ID: <20051017201309.GA24171@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <op.sys3fqo99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> References: <20051017044005.GA11725@nagual.pp.ru> <1129524254.49644.5.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20051017061625.GA13905@nagual.pp.ru> <op.syr2g4dm9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20051017160945.GB21311@nagual.pp.ru> <op.sysxzi1p9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20051017181759.GA22758@nagual.pp.ru> <op.sys2nppc9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20051017195421.GA23837@nagual.pp.ru> <op.sys3fqo99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 03:05:40PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > What's the difference? How does it causes problem? mkfontscale and > mkfontdir create the first one. At least 'monospaced' make obvious difference for programs which search monospaced fonts, like firefox, etc. For "book" and "m" I don't exactly remember where they are used. ttmkfdir without -p option (and pango) simple can't fetch this information from the font and use standard (wrong) placeholders. In few words, the difference is correct/incorrect description of the minor font parameters. > You know what, I don't think I can add tahoma in fonts.dir....because I mention you need to strip it out under number 1) in some of my replies: > 1) Strip out of there 'tahoma' lines (not part of webfonts) and reduce > count. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051017201309.GA24171>