Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 05:20:20 +0900 From: takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp To: Nick Hibma <hibma@skylink.it>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, dfr@nlsystems.com Subject: Re: newbus and modem(s) Message-ID: <199904182020.FAA24081@libr.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 18 Apr 1999 21:01:38 %2B0200." <Pine.BSF.3.96.990418205350.3261E-100000@heidi.plazza.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.96.990418205350.3261E-100000@heidi.plazza.it>, Nick Hibm a wrote: >> Why would I say it wasn't ready? Because outside of core (apparently), >> nobody was warned/told that this was going to be committed in a few >> days/hours/minutes. >I've ported the newconfig style USB code of NetBSD to FreeBSD and I >really prefer the newbus style, because it is truly dynamic. Simple Question. If there were 'Closed'-Host-Controller-Interface with object-only driver, Can the vendor make the Host controller recognized without changing usb.c code? #That's what frustrated me while writing driver for smbus controller. Takanori Watanabe <a href="http://www.planet.kobe-u.ac.jp/~takawata/key.html">; Public Key</a> Key fingerprint = 2C 51 E2 78 2C E1 C5 2D 0F F1 20 A3 11 3A 62 2A To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904182020.FAA24081>