Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 01:01:58 +0200 From: Pawel Tyll <ptyll@nitronet.pl> To: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> Subject: Re: buildworld FAIL. Message-ID: <834458221.20110424010158@nitronet.pl> In-Reply-To: <20110423125247.GA89102@icarus.home.lan> References: <926783796.20110423022501@nitronet.pl> <20110423005422.GQ91591@over-yonder.net> <2910134705.20110423090442@nitronet.pl> <20110423125247.GA89102@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Jeremy, >> So was NO_OPENSSL deprecated or something? > I think he's implying that hast indirectly relies upon OpenSSL. > I would classify this as a bug/oversight that should be properly dealt > with via an #error statement or similar -- the current result (what > you've reported) is not acceptable. Possibly WITHOUT_HAST could be > created and worked into the appropriate frameworks. > And again, please see about cleaning up your make.conf and moving the > appropriate settings to src.conf. src.conf(5) man page should help you. > The variables are not named 100% identical either, so don't just > copy-paste. I understand "it's a machine from the FreeBSD 4.x days", > but that's no excuse for lazy administration. Try to keep up. :-) Well, yeah, there's ZFS-on-root here, IPMI and other new stuff around here, but make.conf was passed on from generation to generation. I suppose it's about time to move on to src.conf, I had this thought about a year ago :) - some prodding with warnings or errors after make buildworld could be nice ;) Thanks for clarification of the situation.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?834458221.20110424010158>