Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:07:10 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEvDtm5pZw==?= <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: standard-supfile = stable-supfile with 5.3 ? Message-ID: <20041109110549.DC3ED6142@hoppel.local>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rob wrote: > If so, then why do we have a standard-supfile and a stable-supfile > doing the same thing? If both bring you -STABLE, one of the two seems > to be redundant to me and having two sup files doing the same only > causes confusion. Maybe you're right. There is a kind of redundancy now, but these two = files brought not always the same. It would be more confusing if you = have two different files and someday one them is missing, because = someone deleted it. Bj=C3=B6rn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041109110549.DC3ED6142>