Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:30:44 -0600 From: Ron McDowell <rcm@fuzzwad.org> To: Devin Teske <devin.teske@fisglobal.com> Cc: 'Alexander Best' <arundel@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PREVIEW] bsdconfig(8) Message-ID: <4F5657D4.3070009@fuzzwad.org> In-Reply-To: <0bbc01ccfbc4$60904090$21b0c1b0$@fisglobal.com> References: <0b7101ccfb32$58d459f0$0a7d0dd0$@fisglobal.com> <20120306091003.GA77008@freebsd.org> <0bbc01ccfbc4$60904090$21b0c1b0$@fisglobal.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Not sure this will get to -hackers, I'm not on their list. More below... On 3/6/12 12:10 PM, Devin Teske wrote: >> 3) when bsdconfig starts the note regarding the packages shouldn't state >> "Pascal". most people probably don't know what pascal is. ;) how about >> VirtualBox or chromium? these packages are probably used by a lot more >> users. > ^_^ Agreed. Ron, can we change this? > > Thoughts: I'm thinking that we should name some high-visibility software here. > Say... Firefox :-D That text was snagged verbatim from sysinstall. I'm open to any changes there. >> 4) do we really need fdisk and disklabel? hasn't freebsd moved onto gpart >> and glabel? >> > I've been thinking about this a lot lately. > > I've been thinking that we should combine the Fdisk and DiskLabel menus into a > single menu that calls sade(8). > > Thoughts? I'd agree with that for the 10.0 version. For 9.x I'd rather see them separate as that's the way they are in sysinstall. Make sense? -- Ron McDowell San Antonio TX
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F5657D4.3070009>