Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 14:28:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libkse -> libpthread Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304211427520.86328-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <3EA4382F.6CA7C63A@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > Since libkse seems to be generally useful, anyone mind if I > > > go back to installing it as libpthread? > > > > There is some question over whether kse or thr will be the default > > threading implementation for 5.1. I think this should be discussed before > > we decide on what lib uses libpthread. > > Isn't libthr really just libkse with N = M? yes and no.. it could have been but for practical reasons was implemented separatly. > > These should behave exactly the same, right? It should even be > possible to drop the UTS out of the picture for everything but > signal handling, I think (i.e. it would never get upcalled) in > the 1:1 case, if this were done? > > -- Terry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-threads@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-threads-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0304211427520.86328-100000>